We've launched our new site at www.openlighting.org. This wiki will remain and be updated with more technical information.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Products"
From wiki.openlighting.org
m (Category talk:Products moved to Talk:Products: moved to non-category page) |
|
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 09:40, 15 February 2007
I propose that all the sub-categories get merged to this page, so the "products" page contain direct links to the per-product descriptions pages.
The goal is to improve the overview by showing how many products there are in each category, and to link the product name to a category (to show which one is where).
I tend to agree. How about we remove the Category tags from the sub categories and list them (the sub-categories) on a main Products page ? Something like:
- Accessories
- Adapters
- Clothing
etc.
What About
The products are categorized by their type, their use etc.
Contents
Computer Interfaces
- USB
- Anyma uDMX (small, buffered, source code for firmware, schematic and pcb available)
- Ben Suffolk's [USB DMX]
- Enttec DMX USB Pro (bufered, galvanic isolation)
- Enttec Open DMX USB (schematic and pcb available)
- Sandsys UMX2
- Sandsys UMX4
- Peperoni Light's Rodin1
- Velleman K8062
- Serial ports
- Pulsar PMX2DMX
- Parallel ports
- Manolator (can be powered from a USB port)
Ethernet Interfaces
- Other
Software
Category:Accessories
Notes
Oh, now I see what you mean by the per-product description page. We definitely shouldn't be listing the products themselves here - it's going to be unmaintainable not to mention creating a large page. Adding a product should be a single edit rather than having to update multiple pages (I'm not happy with having to link to them under a company as well). nomis52 20:37, 29 January 2007 (PST)
New version of the proposal
Should the list below replace the current "producs" page? --Beier 10:10, 13 February 2007 (PST)
The products are categorized by their type, their use etc.
Computer Interfaces
Ethernet Interfaces
Consoles
Software
Accessories
Looks good. The only thing I'd suggest is to sort alphabetically.